Re-Inspection Program
The C.R.A. has previously warned its members of the possibility of B.A.R. re-instituting its Auto Body Re-inspection Program. On November 13th and again on November 27th, the new Chief of the Bureau Sherry Mehl stated that B.A.R. will be offering to reinspect consumer’s vehicles. A toll free line is being set up and they plan to have the program operational soon. The program would appear to be for the general public however it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize the driving force behind this is the insurers .The insurers will be trying to use B.A.R .to enforce their will. Those of you that do a high volume of repair will have a higher likelihood of having vehicles reinspected. If B.A.R. finds a significant problem with a repair they will be looking further. Don’t make their job easier.
You need to take the necessary steps to insure that the invoice you provide your customer accurately reflects the jobs performed and parts supplied. It is also important to make sure that your final invoice is forwarded to the insurer. A comprehensive quality control program will be invaluable to insure your compliance. Defending yourself can be very costly.
If you need assistance with compliance please call us at 707-636-1770 or you can reach Allen Wood at 916-837-2362.
Lets all work together to show our critics what we as an industry can do.
Penalty Guidelines/Citations
You may think the re-inspection program was bad, well get ready! The new Bureau Chief while discussing proposed changes to the Bureau’s Penalty Guidelines advised that some of the revisions were in preparation for the issuance of citations for paperwork violations. She stated this is to allow for lower level enforcement actions, a different option to filing an accusation. You will have an appeal process. Many of you will recall that the Bureau stopped issuing Notices of Violation as a result of frivolous law suits filed by the Treavor Law Group. It appears now that the Bureau finds it necessary to initiate a new bureaucratic methodology, under the guise of creating a lesser evil, to regulate the industry. The Bureau does have the authority under section 125.9 of the Business and Professions code to implement this process. A process that prior administrations have refused to utilize. Since this is a formal disciplinary action, would an insurer use this as a reason to pull a DRP contract, you decide. The Chief after lengthy discussion regarding changes to the Disciplinary Guidelines has stated that she would review the proposal with staff and in the interim would take further comment from the industry. We are working with other industry groups to try and influence her to change her position .The current version of the guidelines are in section3395.4 of the California Code of Regulations, pages 247 to 251 in the B.A.R. Laws and Regulations book. Find it here. We will keep you informed.










